Remittances and Crypto Use in Bangladesh: Why Digital Currencies Are Still Banned

Remittances and Crypto Use in Bangladesh: Why Digital Currencies Are Still Banned

Remittance Cost Calculator

Send Money to Bangladesh

See how much you could save with regulated remittance services

Results

Standard Remittance Fees 6.5%
New App Fees 3.8%
Fees Paid $0.00
Amount Received $0.00
Savings $0.00
Note: The average fee for traditional remittances in Bangladesh is 6.5% (World Bank data), while newer services like Remittance Direct offer fees as low as 3.8%. Crypto-based remittances remain illegal in Bangladesh.

For millions of Bangladeshis working abroad, sending money home isn’t just a transaction-it’s survival. In fiscal year 2025, Bangladesh received a record $30 billion in remittances. That’s more than the country earned from its entire ready-made garment industry. Families in Sylhet, Khulna, and Chittagong rely on these funds to pay for food, school fees, and medical bills. But here’s the catch: even as remittance inflows hit all-time highs, using cryptocurrency to send money home is still illegal.

Why Remittances Are So Big in Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s remittance boom didn’t happen by accident. It’s the result of a deliberate shift in policy. Between 2023 and 2025, the central bank, Bangladesh Bank, cracked down on informal money channels like hundi, a traditional underground system that moved billions outside the official banking network. At the same time, they made formal channels faster and cheaper. Mobile apps like bKash and Nagad now let workers in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S. send money directly to a recipient’s phone in under an hour.

By July 2025, remittance inflows hit $2.48 billion in a single month-up nearly 30% from the same month the year before. The first nine months of FY2024-25 brought in $21.77 billion, compared to just $17.07 billion in the same period the year before. That’s not growth. That’s a surge.

Why? Three things: competitive exchange rates, better digital tools, and the collapse of informal networks. The government didn’t just encourage formal remittances-they made the old ways risky and unreliable. And it worked. Foreign exchange reserves jumped to $25.63 billion, helping stabilize the taka and reduce inflation.

The High Cost of Sending Money Home

Even with all this progress, sending money to Bangladesh still costs too much. The average fee is 6.5%, according to the World Bank. That means for every $100 sent, $6.50 disappears in fees. The global target? 3%. Bangladesh is still nearly double that.

Users report mixed experiences. One worker in Dubai told Reddit he sent $500 via bKash and got it credited in 12 hours. Another in the UK said he paid 7% on the same amount, even though the official exchange rate was better. The problem isn’t just the fee-it’s inconsistency. Banks and agents often offer different rates, and some recipients wait days for funds to appear.

There’s a new app, Remittance Direct, launched by Bangladesh Bank in August 2025. It’s cutting fees to 3.8% on average, which is below the market rate. It’s also faster-processing 85% of transfers in under four hours. But adoption is still low. Most users stick with the apps they know, even if they’re expensive.

Families in Dhaka celebrate remittance arrivals on their phones, while a central bank mascot blocks crypto coins from entering.

Why Crypto Is Still Banned

Here’s where things get complicated. While remittance channels are improving, cryptocurrency remains completely off-limits. Since 2017, Bangladesh Bank has banned all crypto transactions under Section 33 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. In September 2025, they issued a new warning: any company caught facilitating crypto remittances faces license revocation and criminal charges.

Why? The central bank says crypto threatens monetary control and financial stability. They argue that digital currencies can’t be tracked, regulated, or taxed. Unlike bank transfers, which leave a paper trail, crypto transactions are anonymous and irreversible. That’s a nightmare for regulators trying to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.

There’s also a political layer. After the 2024 political transition, the government moved aggressively to bring all financial flows under state control. Informal systems like hundi collapsed. Crypto would be the next informal system-and it’s one they won’t tolerate.

Compare this to neighbors like India and Pakistan. Both have started exploring regulated crypto use for remittances. Bangladesh? Not even close. The governor of Bangladesh Bank said in October 2025: “Cryptocurrency has no place in Bangladesh’s remittance ecosystem for the foreseeable future.”

What People in the Diaspora Think

The ban isn’t popular among expats. A Facebook group with over half a million Bangladeshi expats found that 63% are frustrated with high fees and slow transfers. But only 12% have tried crypto. Why? Fear. They know the risk. Getting caught could mean fines, account freezes, or worse.

Some try to use peer-to-peer crypto platforms, converting Bitcoin or USDT to local currency through unofficial traders. But these deals are risky. Scams are common. One user on Prothom Alo’s forum lost $300 in fees and waited 10 days for a $500 transfer that never arrived. He didn’t use crypto-he used a middleman. But the pain point is the same: the system is broken.

There’s no real alternative. If you want to send money legally, you use bKash, Nagad, or a bank. If you want speed and lower fees, you risk it on the black market. Crypto isn’t an option-it’s a crime.

Expats hold digital remittance apps as a Bitcoin symbol fades into darkness, marked with a ban stamp.

What’s Next for Remittances in Bangladesh

Bangladesh Bank has a clear roadmap: get 95% of remittances digital by 2027. They’re expanding the Real-Time Gross Settlement system, cutting transfer times from days to hours. They’re also working with India’s UPI system to make sending money from Indian workers easier.

But they’re not planning to touch crypto. Not now. Not next year. The central bank is watching CBDCs-central bank digital currencies-but even those are years away. Their focus is on making the current system better, not replacing it with something uncontrolled.

Experts are divided. Some say the remittance boom is real and sustainable. Others warn it’s fueled by temporary factors: political changes, global labor demand, and a one-time crackdown on hundi. If those fade, growth could stall.

One thing is certain: Bangladesh’s remittance system is now the most efficient in South Asia. It outperforms Pakistan and Nepal. But it’s still expensive, inconsistent, and closed to innovation.

Why This Matters Beyond Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s story isn’t just about money. It’s about control. In a world where crypto promises freedom from banks, Bangladesh chose the opposite path: total state oversight. They didn’t just allow digital payments-they mandated them. And they used regulation, not technology, to force change.

For other developing countries watching this, the lesson is clear: you can modernize remittances without crypto. But you need strong institutions, political will, and public trust. Bangladesh built that. And they’re not giving it up.

For now, if you’re a Bangladeshi worker abroad, your best bet is still bKash, Nagad, or a bank transfer. Crypto might be faster, cheaper, and more private. But in Bangladesh, it’s not worth the risk.

Is it legal to use crypto for remittances in Bangladesh?

No, it is not legal. Bangladesh Bank has banned all cryptocurrency transactions since 2017 under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Any entity or individual facilitating crypto-based remittances risks license revocation, fines, and criminal prosecution. The ban was reinforced with a new warning notice in September 2025.

Why does Bangladesh ban crypto but allow digital remittances?

Digital remittances through apps like bKash and Nagad are fully regulated and traceable. Every transaction is tied to a user’s National ID, mobile number, and bank account. Crypto, by contrast, is anonymous and decentralized. The central bank can’t monitor it, tax it, or stop illicit flows. They want control-not chaos.

How much do remittances cost in Bangladesh on average?

The average fee is 6.5%, according to the World Bank’s 2024 data. This is nearly double the global Sustainable Development Goal target of 3%. Newer platforms like Bangladesh Bank’s Remittance Direct app have lowered fees to 3.8%, but most users still pay 5-7% through traditional agents and banks.

What’s the biggest challenge in sending remittances to Bangladesh?

The biggest challenge is inconsistent exchange rates and hidden fees. Even when the official rate is favorable, banks and agents often offer worse rates to pocket the difference. Processing delays also remain common, especially for smaller transfers. Rural recipients often lack the digital literacy or documentation needed to access funds quickly.

Could Bangladesh ever allow crypto remittances in the future?

Not anytime soon. Bangladesh Bank has shown no interest in relaxing its crypto ban. While they’re exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), they’ve made it clear that private cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or USDT will not be permitted. The central bank views crypto as a threat to monetary sovereignty and financial stability, not a solution.

Which countries send the most remittances to Bangladesh?

The Middle East dominates, accounting for 68.3% of all remittances. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar are the top three sources. The United States contributes 12.7%, and Malaysia adds 8.4%. Together, these regions supply over 90% of Bangladesh’s remittance inflows.

16 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Brian Gillespie

    November 12, 2025 AT 13:44
    This is insane. 6.5% fees? For what?
  • Image placeholder

    Ainsley Ross

    November 12, 2025 AT 21:43
    I’ve sent money to family in Sylhet for years. bKash works, but the exchange rate always feels rigged. I don’t blame them for banning crypto - too many scams. Still, 6.5% is a tax on love.

    It’s not about control. It’s about protecting people who can’t protect themselves.
  • Image placeholder

    Wayne Dave Arceo

    November 13, 2025 AT 09:35
    The central bank is correct. Crypto is an anarchist’s playground. You can’t tax what you can’t track. Bangladesh isn’t some crypto libertarian fantasyland - it’s a nation of 170 million people who need stability, not volatility. The fact that you even question this shows how out of touch you are.
  • Image placeholder

    Joanne Lee

    November 15, 2025 AT 02:26
    I appreciate the thorough breakdown. One thing that stood out: the comparison to India and Pakistan’s cautious openness. Is there any data on how many Bangladeshi expats are using crypto despite the ban? Or is that data simply nonexistent because it’s illegal?

    I’m curious if the government is actively monitoring P2P channels or just relying on fear.
  • Image placeholder

    Laura Hall

    November 16, 2025 AT 19:34
    okay but like… why is this even a debate? people are PAYING 6.5% to send money so their moms can buy rice? that’s not finance, that’s cruelty. i get the fear of crypto being used for crime but so are cash and hundi. why not regulate it instead of punishing the poor? i’m so tired of ‘control over chaos’ when the system is literally choking families.

    also why is no one talking about the fact that remittance direct has 3.8% but nobody uses it? because people don’t trust government apps. they trust bKash because it’s fast. period.
  • Image placeholder

    Arthur Crone

    November 17, 2025 AT 19:27
    Crypto ban? Good. People who use it are idiots. They think they’re hackers but they’re just getting scammed by Nigerian guys on Telegram. The real crime is paying 7% fees. But that’s your fault for not learning how to use bKash properly. Fix your own life before blaming the state.
  • Image placeholder

    Michael Heitzer

    November 19, 2025 AT 01:29
    There’s a deeper truth here. Bangladesh didn’t just modernize remittances - it redefined dignity. For generations, sending money home was a silent struggle. Now it’s a digital lifeline. The state didn’t crush innovation - it channeled it. Crypto promises freedom but delivers chaos. What Bangladesh built? That’s real freedom. The freedom to know your money arrives. The freedom to trust the system. The freedom to breathe.

    And yes - it’s not perfect. But it’s ours. And it’s working.
  • Image placeholder

    Rebecca Saffle

    November 20, 2025 AT 09:16
    I’m so angry. My cousin lost $800 trying to use a crypto middleman. He thought he was being smart. He got ghosted. Now his daughter can’t get insulin. And the government just sits there saying ‘no crypto’ like it’s a moral victory. It’s not. It’s negligence wrapped in bureaucracy.
  • Image placeholder

    Adrian Bailey

    November 22, 2025 AT 07:45
    Honestly i think the whole crypto thing is overblown. Like yeah it’s banned but people are still doing it anyway, right? i saw a post on a bangladeshi subreddit last week where someone said they used USDT to send $200 to their aunt in Khulna and it arrived in 20 mins with 1.2% fees. but they didn’t say how they did it lol. also i think the real issue is that most people don’t even know remittance direct exists. i’m in the US and i’ve been reading about this for months and i still didn’t know it existed until today. so maybe the problem isn’t crypto… it’s just bad communication. also typoed ‘remittance’ twice in this comment whoops 😅
  • Image placeholder

    Rachel Everson

    November 22, 2025 AT 21:35
    To anyone feeling frustrated: you’re not alone. I’ve been there. My brother sends money every month. He hates the fees. He hates the delays. But he doesn’t risk crypto because he’s seen what happens when things go wrong. The system isn’t fair - but it’s the safest option we have right now.

    Here’s what you can do: push for transparency. Demand better rates from your remittance provider. Share info about Remittance Direct. Tell your friends. Change doesn’t come from breaking rules - it comes from making the system better from within.
  • Image placeholder

    Johanna Lesmayoux lamare

    November 24, 2025 AT 16:02
    6.5% is robbery. End of story.
  • Image placeholder

    ty ty

    November 26, 2025 AT 15:50
    Wow. So Bangladesh is like… the only country that gets it? I mean, imagine if the US did this. We’d be crying about ‘financial freedom’ and ‘decentralization.’ But here? They just… fix the problem. No drama. No crypto bros. Just results. Maybe we should all just shut up and learn.
  • Image placeholder

    BRYAN CHAGUA

    November 26, 2025 AT 19:49
    This is one of the most thoughtful pieces I’ve read on remittances in years. The focus on institutional trust over technological novelty is refreshing. Most countries chase shiny new tools - Bangladesh chose to build confidence. That takes courage. And it’s working. The fact that reserves are up and inflation is down? That’s not luck. That’s governance.
  • Image placeholder

    Arthur Coddington

    November 28, 2025 AT 13:48
    They banned crypto because they’re scared. Scared of losing control. Scared of the diaspora finding power outside the state. This isn’t about stability - it’s about authoritarianism dressed up as economic policy. We’re not talking about money. We’re talking about silence. And Bangladesh is choosing silence.
  • Image placeholder

    Diana Dodu

    November 30, 2025 AT 02:05
    I’m so tired of Westerners acting like Bangladesh is backward. We built a remittance system that outperforms India’s and Pakistan’s. We didn’t need crypto. We didn’t need chaos. We used policy, discipline, and willpower. You want to know why we banned crypto? Because we didn’t want to become another Venezuela. We chose dignity over delusion.
  • Image placeholder

    Raymond Day

    November 30, 2025 AT 20:22
    I’m not a fan of crypto... but this? 😤 This is a disaster. 6.5%? For a mother in Sylhet to get $93.50 instead of $100? That’s not a fee - that’s theft. And the government? They’re not protecting people - they’re protecting their own power. Crypto is risky? So is hundi. So are banks. But at least crypto doesn’t require a National ID to send love to your family. #CryptoForThePeople 🚫🏦

Write a comment

*

*

*